2:03 p.m.
Dear all,
we are looking forward meeting you at our BoF during SC:
https://www.vi4io.org/events/2017/bof-sc-bof
Enclosed is a fancy flyer revealing some information about the Top 3
without giving too much information.
Thanks,
Julian
--
http://wr.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/people/julian_kunkel
3:03 p.m.
Thanks Julian! And thanks to everyone on this list for helping bring this
to fruition. We are very excited to have our first ever IO500 list that we
never could have done without this community. We are really looking
forward to the discussion and analysis that the list enables. For example,
I find it interesting that the current top spot earned its way there due to
really high bandwidth even though its IOPS was much lower than the current
second spot. Looking forward to the BOF.
Thanks,
John
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Julian Kunkel <juliankunkel(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
Dear all,
we are looking forward meeting you at our BoF during SC:
https://www.vi4io.org/events/2017/bof-sc-bof
Enclosed is a fancy flyer revealing some information about the Top 3
without giving too much information.
Thanks,
Julian
--
http://wr.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/people/julian_kunkel
_______________________________________________
IO-500 mailing list
IO-500(a)vi4io.org
https://www.vi4io.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/io-500
9:52 p.m.
On Nov 9, 2017, at 8:03 AM, John Bent <johnbent(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For example, I find it interesting that the current top spot earned its way there due to
really high bandwidth even though its IOPS was much lower than the current second spot.
Looking forward to the BOF.
If we consider #1 as winner of BW, and #2 as winner of IOPS, we can still see that the #1
IOPS / #2 IOPS was still higher than #2 BW / #1 BW.
It will be interesting to see what the absolute values are, and of course who submitted
results. I think this first list will get the ball rolling, and should definitely
increase the interest in submission for following years.
It would also be interesting to hear if any of the sites submitting results had any
feedback on the process.
Cheers, Andreas
2362
days inactive
2363
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andreas Dilger -
John Bent -
Julian Kunkel