Re: [IO-500] Reminder for Supercomputing BoF
On Nov 9, 2017, at 8:03 AM, John Bent <johnbent(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For example, I find it interesting that the current top spot earned its way there due to
really high bandwidth even though its IOPS was much lower than the current second spot.
Looking forward to the BOF.
If we consider #1 as winner of BW, and #2 as winner of IOPS, we can still see that the #1
IOPS / #2 IOPS was still higher than #2 BW / #1 BW.
It will be interesting to see what the absolute values are, and of course who submitted
results. I think this first list will get the ball rolling, and should definitely
increase the interest in submission for following years.
It would also be interesting to hear if any of the sites submitting results had any
feedback on the process.
Cheers, Andreas
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 195 bytes)