We are looking forward to your submission. Email is a nice way to get
slower feedback on larger issues whereas our slack is useful for immediate
feedback on smaller issues. We will update the webpage; thanks for bringing
that to our attention.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:20 PM Ruibo Wang <ruibowang(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'll submit the final result in the coming week.
BTW, my name is Ruibo, not Rubio. Thank you.
It seems that the mail list here is not very active. Are you using the
slack to communicate with each other? If so, please update the slack
invitation link in your web page. That is not active now.
John Bent <johnbent(a)gmail.com> 于2019年11月2日周六 上午7:38写道：
> Hello Rubio,
> Thank you for your email. We look forward to your submission and will
> conduct our analysis of the "shift" effects once all SC19 submissions have
> been received.
> The IO500 Committee
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:03 PM Ruibo Wang via IO-500 <io-500(a)vi4io.org>
>> Dear All,
>> I've built a cluster to test the IO500 benchmark.
>> The preliminary results showed that the new "shift" parameter did
>> influence the stat result badly.
>> If I use "-N" parameter, the mdtest result is:
>> mdtest_easy_stat 1429.930 kiops : time 253.86 seconds
>> mdtest_hard_stat 962.500 kiops : time 191.10 seconds
>> If I don't use "-N" parameter, the mdtest result is:
>> mdtest_easy_stat 200250.000 kiops : time 1.84 seconds
>> mdtest_hard_stat 51038.200 kiops : time 4.47 seconds
>> It is clear that the "shift" parameter change will impact the stat
>> result with the same hardware and software configuration. Now I'm still
>> trying to optimize the test. Hope I'll deliver a better result later.
>> Ruibo Wang
>> IO-500 mailing list